Specified signs prohibited.
Citation
Fla. Stat. § 479.11
Country
State
Population
22,244,823
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
roadway lighting
Definitions.
Citation
7-7101a et seq
Country
State
Population
1,018,396
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
Floodlights intended for private property illumination located within the state right-of-way on state highways.
Citation
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-143d
Country
State
Population
3,605,597
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
Highway and roadway lighting designed to maximize energy conservation and minimize light pollution. State and municipal funds.
Citation
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-110a
Country
State
Population
3,626,205
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
Restriction of outdoor advertising structures, signs, displays or devices
Citation
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-123
Country
State
Population
3,626,205
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
Outdoor lighting fixtures funded by the state - standards.
Citation
C.R.S. 24-82-902
Country
State
Population
5,839,926
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
Powers and duties of governing bodies, planning commissions, and boards of adjustment.
Citation
C.R.S. 30-11-605
Country
State
Population
5,839,926
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
Powers and duties of the executive director of the department of public health and environment.
Citation
C.R.S. 43-1-404
Country
State
Population
5,839,926
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
Outdoor lighting controls and equipment
Citation
2022 California Energy Code Title 24 Part 6 § 130.2
Country
State
Population
38,940,231
Dark Sky Approved Policy
No
92 S.W.3d 540
Full Case Name
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Michael W. Behrens, Robert L. Nichols, John W. Johnson, and Ric Williamson, Appellants, v. CITY OF SUNSET VALLEY, Terrance R. Cowan, and Donald Hurwitz, Appellees
Date
08-30-2002
Court
Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction
Texas
Plaintiffs
Defendants
Incident Location
Sunset Valley, TX
Disputed Act
City and city officials filed action against Texas Dept. of Transportation (TxDOT) concerning highway expansion. District Court awarded city damages and fees; declared TxDOT violated administrative regulations regarding noise and lighting, enjoined private nuisance, and enjoined equal protection violations from use of flood lights and failure to erect city limit signs.
Holding
Declaratory judgement that TxDOT and officials violated environmental regulations relating to noise and lighting from highway expansion was not warranted; Nuisance claims against TxDOT for use of high mast floodlights were not barred by sovereign immunity.
Disposition